Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journyx (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 03:37, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Journyx (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unbelievable kept of course in 2006 since no one actually cared, or at least substantially cared about the concerns of articles now, since this is simply an advertisement, sourced by its own published-republished PR and words, and that's also what I'm finding with my own searches; history also shows likely advertising initiations, likely either involved or influenced by the company. SwisterTwister talk 05:20, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:23, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:36, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:36, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.